2014 — 20 January: Monday

I seem to have succeeded in talking myself out of the need to go shooting out to the (fresh food) shop "first thing" for the time being1 — so I can enjoy my cuppa while BBC Radio 3 washes over me.

Meanwhile...

... while I very much enjoyed the book by William Deresiewicz ...

Book

... I mentioned here. And while I must admit I was rather less taken by the more recent book by Michael Suk-Young ...

Game Theorist?

... which (I noted) had been somewhat debunked by Leon Wieseltier, I have to smile when I now see Deresiewicz weighing-in against (and rather effectively demolishing) it. Source and snippet:

What we really get, once we fight through Chwe's meandering, ponderous, frequently self-contradictory argument, is only the claim that Austen wants her characters to think in game-theoretic ways: to reflect upon the likely consequences of their choices, to plan out how to reach their goals, to try to intuit what the people around them are thinking and how they in turn are likely to act...
Chwe runs through a series of alternatives — emotions, instincts, habits, rules, social factors, ideology, intoxication (not being in your right mind), the constraints of circumstance — claiming to show that Austen rejects them as possible sources of action. But Austen wasn't dumb enough to think that people never act out of habit or instinct or sudden emotion. All Chwe really shows is that she thought they shouldn't. Austen knew, in other words, that human motivation is enormously complex. Reducing it to any single factor — well, for that you need a social scientist.

William Deresiewicz in New Republic


Ouch! Come back, CP Snow. What was that remark about the viciousness of academic politics by that horrible chap, Henry Kissinger? :-)

Mind you, this piece by Taki is every bit as vicious, and funny to (put the) boot (in).

Call me a...

... suspicious, distrustful old git if you like, but this...

Dubious idea

... strikes me as an extremely dubious idea and a rather dismal development for UK society. I wonder how much overtime was claimed by the industry lobbyists? Their champagne bill alone doesn't bear thinking about.

In happier news...

... I was able to thank my Birmingham cousins for their generous Xmas gift (an Amazon certificate) that I managed to put to jolly good use last night, after a long, thoughtful — some might even say "arduous" — web-browsing session :-)

As I told them: That will feed the few remaining brain cells for a while longer, I hope. Thank you both so much.

  

Footnote

1  The time being not yet 07:30 :-)